Argentine aftermath
By Ben Knight
Author’s note: No, I can’t really explain to your dear, patient people why it should ever take this many days to get a breezy little blog item out of my head and onto the Internet. Some combination of work, lack of work, exhaustion, romance, living in two cities, covering Juve-Fiorentina for CP, a heatwave, car woes, dental distraction, a doctor’s appointment and One Other Thing ©. With all that said – and before we all watch the Venezuela match tonight – let’s go back to Buenos Aires:
They’re so fast – relentless. They leap on mistakes like pumas on a wounded bratwurst.
In a packed park in Buenos Aires, World Cup-bound Argentina laid a 5-0 sledgehammering on a game but exposed Canada, in their final tune-up game before next month’s World Cup in South Africa.
Canada didn’t play all that badly overall, I thought. But any margin they’d usually have – that half second before the tackle, that yard of space you’d normally have to work with – was simply gone.
Relentless Argentine ball-hawking and layered, almost rugby-style fast breaks rendered Canadian intention and strategy irrelevant. The lads in red did what they could. What was done to them could not be reasonably withstood.
So – a disaster? An embarrassment? Honorary mention at the world avalanche-eating championship?
I’m going to take the minority position – that this was actually a useful exercise.
I mean, we’ve finally got a Canadian Soccer Association that actually gets the men’s team playing in the run-in to the World Cup. An away match with Argentina would have come along negative-once in a lifetime up until now. Everyone from the players to the coaches to the fans knew Our Lads could be in for a freight-training.
That was never going to be the point.
Canada’s players got to see something very few professional players ever experience: the full flow and fury of the Argentines – up-close and live – in a gigantic stadium filled with roaring, passionate South American fans.
It’s one thing for you and me to watch the match on television. We see pretty much everything that happens out there, but that’s just the surface stuff. Canada’s players, were they in the stands watching Argentina dismantle someone else, would see more – the way a slight hesitation here turns into a bad result there.
But from the seats, they would see the Argentine ballhawks swoop. When Andre Hainault got his pocket picked on one of the goals, he never saw the predator’s approach. Dwayne de Rosario, harried to the sidelines, knew he was badly outnumbered, and tried to play the ball to safety down the wing. I doubt he ever saw the opponent who stormed out of nowhere, and buried the ball with an outlandish outside-of-the-foot long volley deep into the Canada net.
What Canada saw last Sunday afternoon was How It Is Done. They understand, better than ever before, how suddenly and fatally the counterthrusts can come. If that makes anyone on the roster sharpen his game, that’s good for everyone. If any of the Canucks found a flaw in their thought patterns or assumptions, maybe that saves us a goal-against in a game that matters down the road.
You don’t play a game like this to win, folks. You play because maybe it’s the only chance you’ll ever have – short of actually qualifying for a World Cup – to play the very best, on their turf, on their terms.
In that sense, a 0-5 paste job is likely more beneficial than a tight loss, or even a draw. And while it would have been sensational if Canada’s attack-oriented formation had actually magicked home a goal, that gleaming moment of success might have overshadowed the deeper, more urgent lessons of this rare and scarce opportunity.
Argentina took Canada apart with speed, deception, tenacity, toughness, off-the-ball movement, vision, skill, passion, fury and joy. If the Canadian players went south with any holes in any of those parts of their game, they know it much clearer and better than they ever did before.
For the older players, this match was both a reward for service rendered, and an ultra-intense footballing reality check that should serve them very well in future coaching days. The youngsters – the ones who may, one day, tread a World Cup pitch in real World Cup matches – just got the best view possible of how the best do business.
There’s nothing about playing the Houston Dynamo, or grinding out midwinter matches in Scotland or Norway, that will ever, ever look like that. It was a bad loss on the afternoon – but an excellent set of lessons for the future.
Onward!



May 29th, 2010 at 9:29 am
We’ll stated Ben. Canada has to play many more games of this caliber on an ongoing bases, just like the USA does. This will slowly help build the confidence of everyone in the national program….true learning only happens when we step outside our comfort zone!
May 29th, 2010 at 2:12 pm
not gonna get better playing the likes of Jamaica all the time.
more friendlies like this, please!
May 29th, 2010 at 10:08 pm
Going forward, which top teams are going to agree to play vs Canada in exhibition (warm-up for the World Cup 2014 for example?)? They know there will be no benefits from giving the Canadian boys a hammering. So why even bother to play them? It was a HUGE mis-match. The CSA might just get a “Thanks, but no thanks!” when trying to tempt a top international team.
Would it have been any different with our “best” players on the field? Hmm, likely not.
Broadway.
May 29th, 2010 at 11:21 pm
Not true Broadway…
More teams will line up to play Canada just for that reason and all we will do is get better…
Today against Venezuela I think they said 13 starters were missing, so yes a full Canadian squad would have done better against Argentina but not by much.
May 30th, 2010 at 11:41 am
[...] Full Story Categories: Bloggers, Canadian Game, Men NT, National Teams No Comments » [...]
May 30th, 2010 at 1:34 pm
^^^
I wish everyone had this type of insight when talking about Canadian Soccer..
You’re 100 % spot on this one Ben, I don’t always agree, but you always state your case well.
Canada Definitely learned shit loads on this trip, I did think the goal keeping was a little suspect though, but no matter, Im actually proud that the Boys showed up and played. What else were they gonna do?
Things are looking up, and now I find myself in a dilemma. Do I fly all the way from the west coast to cheer on the boys in the next round of friendlies? Oh what a beautiful problem to have!!!!
May 30th, 2010 at 6:40 pm
This isn’t (or shouldn’t be) a minority opinion, Ben. I’ve been “agreeing” with it since last week…
We won’t improve by playing a defensive struggle with a fellow concacaf also ran. We need to have our guys match up against one of the very best squads at their peak. No, we don’t match up well. We were never going to match up well, even with our best 11. It turns out there is quite a gulf between #63 and #7… who knew?
Yes the defending was suspect. Yes, Cristian, Onstad could have played better, as could the defense. But in the end, had the two “preventable” goals been prevented, I have no doubt that Argentina could have manufactured 2, 3, maybe 5 more as needed.
Our lads were humbled. There is no shame in losing to a side as skilled and fit as Argentina (even if they were laughing at us a little… bad form, but understandable given the ease with which they dominated). I congratulate Stephen Hart on negotiating this friendly, and look forward to future games against top 20 opponents. When you lose 1-0 to Jamaica or someone in our zone, it’s easy to claim the only thing holding us back are “breaks”. When you get completely outplayed and outhustled by your opponent, it’s hard to do anything but admit you aren’t good enough.
Again, there is no shame in a thorough beating like this. The only shame would be to continue to (under)play weak opponents.
Nuff Said!
May 31st, 2010 at 4:29 pm
I’ll add my agreement. A lot of other blogs have talked about how demoralising this is for the players: the players who are demoralised by this won’t make it internationally. The good players, with the right mentality, will say “I’m not good enough” and do what is needed to get better.
Now that I’ve had the advantage of seeing the Venezuela game, I’ll say that I thought we looked pretty good against them. Maybe the difference between #63 and #49 isn’t so big. Of course, neither team was starting their A-list, so we won’t know for sure until a meaningful game gets played, but I was impressed.
I remember watching the CMNT in the 80’s and 90’s and being depressed by how much kick-and-chase we played. There was no buildup, and almost no effort to do anything but play long balls to the forwards. Now, we are 100x better … if only we could shoot.
June 2nd, 2010 at 3:30 pm
I think the game against Argentina was waste for both teams. Playing Venzuela did make sense. More games with oponents like Honduras, Chile and sides like Hungary, Poland,Bulgaria, Romania should be arranged at this stage. No need to play the best simply beacouse the gap is too big and no side will benefit from the game.