New league for Impact, Whitecaps
By Ben Knight
As expected, compromise ruled the day.
The two disputing factions in the feud over who runs second-division men’s pro soccer in this part of the planet has been resolved – for the coming season, at least – under intense pressure from the United States Soccer Federation.
The two sides – old, existing USL-1 and new, rebellious NASL-2 – will each form a conference in a new 12-team league that will kick off this spring.
Canada’s two sides, the Montreal Impact and Vancouver Whitecaps, have been drawn in the “NASL Conference,” along with Carolina, Miami and expansion sides St. Louis and Baltimore. The “USL Conference” includes Portland, Rochester, Puerto Rico, Minnesota, Austin and new boys Tampa Bay.
Scheduling details have not been announced. But if we assume that the two sides still don’t really like each other, and each “conference” feels like it could be its own league a year from now because the other guys are jackasses yadda yadda so there, I think I see a way all this could be hugely good for the Canadian franchises.
Pure speculation, but let’s weight the schedule in favour in conference play. That could easily produce a 32-game regular season, where everyone plays their conference mates four times each, and the other guys twice.
All of a sudden, the ‘Caps and Impact get eight games against expansion teams in their own division. They also get four each against Miami, which has rarely played above bad expansion level for any sustained period of time. Carolina can be a fine squad, but there’s absolutely no difficulty securing high playoff spots here.
Tough, established sides like Portland, Rochester and Puerto Rico? Twice each. C’est tout.
Again, no one’s said this is how it will happen, but the sked length is about right, and it rather honestly reflects this “two-league” thing we’ve all been tap-dancing around since Nu-Rock Holdings bought the USL, and teams started jumping out of every door and window they could find.
No, there will not ultimately be two leagues. But I’m sure both factions are still planning ways to be “the one” in 2011 – when Vancouver and Portland move up to MLS, leaving bad teams, second-year teams, Rochester, Montreal and Carolina.
(Yeah, that’s tough on Minnesota. Bring it, boys!)
Most importantly up here, Montreal and Vancouver have a league to play in, and the Voyageurs Cup will go on unhindered. The future of the entire rest of the operation is still far from certain. But there should be a good share of sloppy wins for both Canadian sides come spring.
Onward!



January 8th, 2010 at 10:52 am
I’m not sure the conferences would see each other as the bad guys should things split next year. After all, TOA teams are represented in both conferences. This feels more like an enforced pause in hostilities rather than any sort of peace. I don’t know many of the important details yet (like who is ultimately calling the shots) but I wouldn’t be surprised to see this all fall apart again right after the last ball is kicked on the 2010 season.
January 8th, 2010 at 10:57 am
Was I the only one hoping that both Montreal and Vancouver would get an early 2010 invite to MLS. Long shot but if they didn’t have a league to play in….
January 8th, 2010 at 8:25 pm
It will one season,however,in a long term MLS will develop/be followed up by a “second” league probably with relegation.
January 8th, 2010 at 9:24 pm
Never happen, Miro. Move on.
January 10th, 2010 at 12:31 pm
Pro/rel will never happen in a league like MLS where teams are awarded on franchise fees and other capital prospective owners have. Philadelphia got their team because of government money received to build their new stadium. Would they have gotten it if they were stuck in a second or third league?
Plus, where huge network television deals are the lifeblood of sports leagues in the U.S. and Canada, MLS would never be on a channel like ESPN if there was a chance they would lose a big market team like New York or Los Angeles to relegation and have them replaced by the likes of Austin or Rochester. Big market cities are what drive television down south.
If you want to follow a soccer league with a pro/rel system, then look elsewhere. It will never be accepted here. Ever. Deal with it and move on.
January 10th, 2010 at 8:14 pm
Why would be getting relegated to second league and then subsequently trying to get promoted again to first league etc…be detrimental to a franchise?…Otherwise this league will have a questionable sporting value…
January 10th, 2010 at 9:02 pm
Guess you have never heard of Leeds United or Queens Park Rangers.
They explain perfectly the perils of relegation.
In a hundred years when we have in excess of 50 true professional teams in the US and Canada then we can perhaps discuss promotion and relegation. But until then………….it matters not a whit.
January 11th, 2010 at 9:45 am
To dream the improbable dream…