Seagull City SC
By Ben Knight
Â
And just like that, the team with the silly name is champion of men’s professional soccer, north of the south end of El Paso, Texas.
They earned it, too – knocking off Columbus, Chicago and Los Angeles, after being just about as dead as dead can be entering their final match in the MLS regular season.
So – just once – in honour of all that – I’m going to call them by name:
Real Salt Lake.
It’s hard to legitimize a name like that. D.C. United and the Houston Dynamo don’t run up against nearly the same credibility problems. Yoinking the appellation of Madrid’s Galacticos, and bolting it to Salt Lake City is stunningly similar to:
- Oklahoma City Celtic
- Hoboken Hotspur
- Sporting Memphis
None of those really get it, though. It’s hard to adequately satirize a name so uniquely and naively arrogant.
- Utah Jazz
And yet, Seagull City SC awake this morning with the one key piece of credibility they have never previously possessed – a championship.
And how they got there is a case study for the MLS playoff system at its most – MLS.
The Gulls were deader than dead when they lost 1-0 at Toronto FC on Danny Dichio Giant Banner Day at BMO Field. Real seagulls rode the swirling lakeshore downdrafts, while the Salt Lake ones sprawled vanquished on the ghastly green plastic of the Canadian soccer dream.
But then Toronto lost in New York – and a whole bunch of other things happened, too. An impossible letter arrived from MLS headquarters, inviting the Cinderella Seagulls to play a series of playoff matches against the defending-champion Columbus Crew.
They won.
Then it was off to Chicago, for an event unique in the history of sport – an Eastern Conference final between teams from the Central and Mountain time zones.
They won.
And then, last night’s star turn in Seattle, downing David Beckham, Landon Donovan et al on penalty kicks to claim the MLS Cup.Â
And no, it doesn’t really matter at all that SLC was a sub-.500 team this year. Struggling teams win cups all over the soccer world. The most tangible difference is that MLS, alone, gives its league championship to the cup lifter, instead of the team which prevails over the entire long grind of the regular season.
But that’s all North American sports. No surprise there.Â
My biggest knock on the Salt Lake team’s name is that I learned early-on it makes curious newcomers write off the entire league without a second thought. But championships do bring legitimacy – unless you’re the Tampa Bay Lightning of the NHL. (That’s actually a better name than RSL, because there’s a lot more lightning in central Florida than there is Spanish royalty in Utah.)
All nomenclature aside, I love what Seagull City did last night. This is a fun little footy team.
I knew they couldn’t bunker with Beckham crossing and Donovan ready to pounce. The best alternative was to push the ball, and keep it in the L.A. end as much as possible, so the Galaxticos would have to run the field anytime they wanted a shot on goal.
This is a task the Salt Lake roster seems built for. Hard hustle and searching passes from Kyle Beckerman in the middle.  Robbie Findley’s scorching speed up-front, alongside the up-tempo, who-knows-what’s-going-to-happen opportunism of Yura Movsisyan. Oh, and that deeply talented Will Johnson kid. Canadian, eh?
I wanted to see them push, push, push all night, and bless their hard-running hearts, they did. Â
It almost didn’t matter. L.A. took gamely to the challenge of having to push the ball 70 yards almost every time they got it. They took the lead on a spectacular three-man move, with perfect long passes from both Beckham and Donovan setting up a Mike Magee tap-in just before the break.
Findley put two stamps on the equalizer – one sloppy, one sublime. Moments before the goal, he was played into the open, hitting mach two on the dead run to daylight. But his first touch was terrible, setting up a three-way collision that injured the hand of Galaxy goalie Donovan Ricketts. That didn’t help at all, shortly after, when Findley made a dazzling move to zip home a crazily bouncing Movsisyan rebound to tie the match.
After that, it was mostly a question of could they keep running? (yes), and could they prevail in the shootout? (yes).
Just as he had a week before in Chicago, SLC ‘keeper Nick Rimando stole the shootout. Only two saves this time, but those and the three he smothered in the East final must all have been on Donovan’s brain when the L.A. Whizbang hoofed his penalty over the bar.
At the start of the season, many observers who thought they knew what they were talking about picked Salt Lake as the best team in the west. It just never got around to happening, even though they could be a blast to watch when they threw it into the high gears and just went sailing.
And now, perhaps the most disappointing team in MLS this season (I’m not always Canada-centric, you know) – has won the cup.
I admire the win, and the way they achieved it. I couldn’t even begin to tell you who the best team in Major League Soccer really is this morning, so in a land of forced parity and teams with silly names, let’s just let the cup speak for itself.
All hail Seagull City SC – 2009 champions of Our Little League.
Onward!
P>S>>> Onward! is accepting donations to offset some year-end expenses. If you love this kind of soccer writing, please consider clicking the donations box on the right side of your screen. Thanks!



November 23rd, 2009 at 10:46 am
why do you call them salt lake seagulls?
November 23rd, 2009 at 11:12 am
Simply look up the history of Salt Lake City and you will find out
November 23rd, 2009 at 12:07 pm
Yes…
I was expecting Ben to refer to the MLS Cup title in the context of the “Miracle of the Gulls”.
November 23rd, 2009 at 12:34 pm
[...] champion such a poor performer is either a Cinderella story, an act of sporting absurdity or just MLS being North American. Take your [...]
November 23rd, 2009 at 4:23 pm
As usual you’re weak on your facts. Plenty of leagues settle their championship with a playoff system followed by a Cup final — Uruguay, Australia, Colombia, Mexico to name a few
November 23rd, 2009 at 6:33 pm
It was the most entertaining game I ever saw in MLS…It could stand scrutiny from a real european soccer league in passing,technigue of at least few players etc……The only disappointng let down again,the artificial turf crap…
November 23rd, 2009 at 10:34 pm
…. and a match completely unavailable for viewing to those without an mlsnet subscription or a satellite dish, or did I miss something?
November 24th, 2009 at 3:29 am
Nope TFCGooner;
It wasn’t even on GOL live, from what I understand.
Gee, it’s funny our “Soccer network” managed to put a bunch of meaningless half assed TFC performances on in prime time (and with a 30 min pregame, no less), but somehow forgot about the playoffs.
I love the Ceeb, but they blew this one badly… the semi finals and cup final should have been on LIVE. Last year both ABC and CBC showed it, this year, ESPN2 & GOL (at 1:30am ET, I’m told) only. I’ve emailled MLS to ask when direct kicks might be available in Canada… they don’t even bother to respond.
Really going all out there, boys… way to build the sport.
November 24th, 2009 at 3:33 am
I watched it on Gol TV Live.{I hope}
November 24th, 2009 at 10:59 am
I also saw it on Gol TV at 830 pm which I believe was live.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:08 am
One semi-final was on GOLTV and the final both Live.
November 24th, 2009 at 1:07 pm
The final was definately on TV in Canada live on GolTV, at least in Ontario.
It’s such a disservice to growing soccer in Canada to put games on a soccer specialty network available only by paid subsription. The only ones who see TFC matches on GolTV or the MLS cup are already fans.
If you’re trying to get people in Canada interested in MLS, what better way than Beckham and Donovan playing before 42,000.00+ in Seattle.
Any person who isn’t a hockey, basketball, CFL, MLB, UFC or poker fan can easily become one by turning on his or her TV to the stations everyone has.
Unless you’re already a TFC or MLS fan in Canada, the odds are you won’t become one, unless you happen to catch one of the games on CBC on Sportsnet; but good luck even keeping up with that, as the games are not for example, every Saturday afternoon on CBC, rather, they are sporadically broadcast at different times and different days, often weeks apart.
November 24th, 2009 at 3:32 pm
So it was on GOL live, then? I was away but set my pvr to catch anything MLS related… only the replay showed up at 1:30am.
Agree w Juve. MLSE needs to pull their heads out… they have a popular club, but only because of exposure. GOL is not available to a lot of viewers, and for the rest of us is in a package that no-one in their right mind would pay full price for… put more games on the networks, and make GOL a pick and pay channel.
I’m hoping the CBC will do a deal with the “new” NASL and show us the Canadian games at least… I suspect there will be 3-4 Canadian teams in it before it’s all over…
November 24th, 2009 at 4:30 pm
I see it’s not just Ben that can’t get his facts straight.
The game was live on gol tv.
In the US It was on espn, not espn2, and their viewing numbers were 30 per cent higher than when it was on abc last year
November 24th, 2009 at 9:10 pm
Re showing TFC and MLS Cup final matches on GolTV………remind yourself of who owns GolTV in Canada……….yup……..MLSE. Need I say any more?
And frankly, who cares whether it was on ESPN, or ESPN2? It makes absolutely no difference seeing as the vast majority of those who post here live in Canada, and likely in Toronto at that.
As for the viewing numbers being higher. That may have nothing to do with who provided the broadcast coverage and everything to do with who was actually playing in the final.
November 24th, 2009 at 9:58 pm
Gol TV is available on Satellite and Cable across the country{Canada}.I am thinking however about getting rid off Setanta Sports as it costs 15$ a month and I almost never watch it…Most soccer nowaddays is on FoxSports,Got TV and Rogers.
November 25th, 2009 at 12:27 am
I forgot CBC as well…
November 25th, 2009 at 9:37 am
Good stuff, Ben (Justin’s usual fits of pique and huffiness aside). As much as that late-night walk home in the cold from the stadium hurt after they knocked out my team, I felt a small (infinitesimal, yes, but still there) bit of satisfaction that “ReAL” Salt Lake was a truly entertaining and stouthearted team that I fully expected to go into Chicago and beat the hated Fire. And I was impressed and sort of surprised that there was almost unanimous preference from our fans for RSL in the conference and cup finals. A lot of this had to do, of course, with not wanting to see Blanco or Beckham raise the cup above their head, but I think the way RSL handled the challenges of the last two weeks of the season, and then the toughest post-season draw I can recall, won Kreis and his players a lot of well-deserved respect (although I can’t say that I wasn’t a little happy to see that diva Javier Morales sobbing on the bench, unable to finish the first half.) It will be interesting to see what effect losing Movsisyan and whoever they lose in the expansion draft will have, and I wonder what Rimando’s contract situation looks like. That 5′10″ keeper’s worth his weight in gold.
November 25th, 2009 at 10:06 am
Observer, Some of us that post here do not live in TO. I am from London.
November 25th, 2009 at 2:36 pm
Cyd, hence the reason I said “the vast majority” and “likely in Toronto”. I am not naive enough to believe that this blog is followed only by those who live in the “centre of the universe” (and yes, my tongue is firmly planted in my cheek).
November 25th, 2009 at 5:39 pm
Cyd…
Why don’t you watch EPL Live in London,then…:)
November 26th, 2009 at 1:10 pm
Has anybody considered the possibility that neither CBC, Sportsnet nor TSN picked up the MLS Cup Final because they either could’t fit it into their schedules or just didn’t want it?
Considering the absolutely disastrous ratings the MLS All-Star Game drew when shown on TSN … albeit on the same night that Real Madrid was playing TFC at BMO … it shouldn’t be a shock that the match ended up on Gol.
November 27th, 2009 at 4:03 pm
Blizzard:
We’ve definitely considered that. My original point was that CBC, SN or other Canadian sports channels shouldn’t be referring to themselves as the “Soccer network” if they can’t even be bothered to broadcast the semis and cup final. Both networks show TFC matches (even ones against no-name opponents) live, yet fail to see the benefit of showing the championship matches of the league TFC participates in. The analogy would be CBC showing the NHL playoffs only until all Canadian teams were eliminated… never going to happen. So why in MLS? Viewers? Well, it’s a new league to Canada. You have to build the business through promotion… ignoring the cup doesn’t do that.
On the other hand, I could understand GOL tv doing this, because they share a corporate parent with TFC… meaning that they could be forgiven for promoting their own property alone.
That said, it is unquestionably poor business sense for MLS not to insist on a wider footprint for the three championship games. You can’t grow a sport if you air meaningless mid season games but fail to make the elite games available to as many viewers as possible. GOL tv, at least as of right now, doesn’t do that (it is not available in some markets and on some cable systems, and on Bell is presently locked in a very poor tier 3 package, unavailable as a pick & pay channel).
The goal should be to bring in new fans, not just exploit the ones MLS already has. Those of us that like the sport (or just TFC) will probably watch. But casual viewers who might be interested in watching will not buy GOL tv just for the privilege.
MLS isn’t nearly big enough to start acting “exclusive” yet.