Edmonton?
By Ben Knight
These are nervy days down in USL-1.
With a bunch of teams actively gone and trying to form a new league of their own, the second tier of men’s pro soccer north of the Rio Grande is trying to make it sound like all is fine and dandy, thanks.
Earlier this week, the league happily burbled it has four expansion teams in the works: Detroit, Boston, Ottawa and Edmonton.
Ottawa – presumably – is the Jeff Hunt group, although they famously don’t have a stadium to play in. Edmonton? No owners named specifically, and none on the horizon as far as anyone can currently tell.
As much as a financially sound pro team in Northern Alberta would be a great thing, this is far too eerily reminiscent of Edmonton’s last kick at the pro soccer can.
Anyone remember the Edmonton Aviators?
Here’s how I wrote it up for Sportsnet.ca five years ago, when these hype-propelled hollow men crashed and burned.
—
July 20, 2004
Crash landing
Soccer’s Edmonton Aviators couldn’t live up to their own ambitions. So what else is new?
Owning a minor-league professional soccer team in Canada sure ain’t easy. Talk about a faith-based initiative! Yeah, the world loves its footie, but this particular part of the world isn’t all that eager to dig into the wallets for tickets or replica jerseys.
It doesn’t help any that this is only the A-League, where there are no big-name players in their prime, and the standard of play is, well, let us be kind and just say it’s naïve.
So before this blast begins, let me just take a moment to express admiration for the owners of the Montreal Impact, Vancouver Whitecaps, Toronto Lynx – heck, even the Calgary Mustangs – who continue to hang in there and put the product on the field, regardless of the odds. Rest assured, I support your efforts, even if I’m not crazy about the league.
And then there’s the Edmonton Aviators. Born a few months back to apparently strong local ownership, Northern Alberta’s latest soccer adventure pancaked on the runway this week. The franchise has been returned to the league, the next home game has been cancelled, and it seems very unlikely the team will escape the history book that is now slamming shut.
It retrospect, it should have been obvious. The Aviators were born in a cloud of grandiose dreaming, exactly the flavour of far-fetched fictional fantasy that has flattened Canadian soccer hopes far too many times in the past.
Specifically: The team announced it would play its games at Commonwealth Stadium before average expected home crowds of 11,000-plus. No, I didn’t like it when I heard it, but I opted to take an optimistic approach, figuring the truth would become clear soon enough, and the Aviators would settle into a smaller park and get properly about the business of creating a couple, then a few, thousand honest, loyal fans. That, after all, is how the A-League game is played.
Surprise, surprise, the Commonwealth caper was a dud. Just over a thousand curious souls showed up for the opener. The team lost a lot, and games started getting shunted out to make way for Edmonton Eskimo football practices. Indeed, Commonwealth conflicts meant the Aviators’ inaugural schedule was heavily front-loaded with road games. That didn’t help either the team’s record or the generation of a fan base.
So now, to the sad, resigned shock of the players, coaches and such fans as actually exist, yet another weak group of big-talking owners has been flushed back to reality, and another Canadian pro soccer team bites the dust.
The timing is beyond terrible. After playing most of the season on the road, the Aviators were just about to start a run of eight games out of nine at home over the next five weeks. Whatever money this team was ever going to make – or at least not lose this year – was going to start coming in now.
In Vancouver, Montreal and Toronto, A-League owners know they can’t afford to fantasize. Surviving one season at a time, selling season tickets one fan at a time, they gear their entire operations to financial survival, and hope their local minor soccer systems turn up enough young talent to lift their teams into contention. It’s not out of the question that the Whitecaps or Impact might even win a championship some day. That would really help, but no one’s counting on it.
Contrasting all this to the Edmonton fiasco, I’m feeling pretty steamed.
Folks, let’s talk about a Canadian professional soccer league. We’ve already got three of the teams that will be there. Unless, that is, either the Lynx or the Whitecaps (or both) get wiped out by the next few rounds of MLS expansion. Calgary? Too soon to tell. They played the big-stadium card as well, and no one is exactly saying they’re financially healthy.
What we have to do – and I include myself here, because I didn’t lean hard enough on the Commonwealth crap – is stop the fly-by-nighters before they get started.
Okay, admittedly, we don’t really have any power here, and I’m not saying Edmonton soccer fans should have boycotted the Aviators. But can we at least agree that there are two different ways of running an A-League soccer team in Canada? There’s the steady, patient, non-spectacular way (Vancouver, Montreal, Toronto, Calgary if they survive), which is the good and proper way forward.
Then there’s the grandiose grab-bag gravy train (Edmonton, Calgary if they don’t survive). My question to all of us? Why do we believe these jokers? I bit on Edmonton because I wanted it to be true. I’m sure I’ve got lots of company. So what do we do the next time a Canadian soccer league proposal comes along?
The biggest reason we can’t have a league now – maybe ever – is there just aren’t enough good owners out there willing to run a small team for marginal returns. This is why the CUSL proposal could never, ever, ever have flown. We have to understand that a new Canadian league would essentially be A-League north, with the talent level boosted a bit by a handful of international players in the early or late days of their careers.
What we do not need – and must no longer tolerate – is the big-talking blowhard owner who makes huge promises and says “trust me.” It doesn’t work, people.
What really galls me about the crash of the Aviators is that I believe there is a good chance this team could have caught on if it hadn’t lashed itself to the Commonwealth Stadium boulder before it leapt into the A-League sea. The local ownership seemed to have a good pedigree. They seemed like a pretty good approximation of what A-League ownership – at least when their mouths were shut.
Well, they didn’t, and we all got fooled again.
Can we make a deal here? The next time this looks like it’s going to happen, let’s all speak out against it.
What’s that old saying? “Fool me twice, shame on me?” Well, this is more than twice, people. From the NASL to the CSL to the NSL to the CPSL to the CUSL to the Aviators, we’ve been fleeced more often than a blanket that got left in a laundromat dryer for a month.
Not all ownership is good ownership. Let’s promise ourselves to all find the courage to say “no” to the next bunch of incoming glad-handing buffoons.
…Or this is as good as it will ever get.
—
Onward!



November 6th, 2009 at 10:47 am
I miss the Brickmen.
November 6th, 2009 at 11:19 am
It was a more innocent time, wasn’t it?
The old CSL was a brave effort, but would never have teams like TFC, the Whitecaps and Impact. Just too small.
November 6th, 2009 at 12:44 pm
Well, I’m ever the optimist…
I really don’t think a pro soccer franchise will ever work in Alberta which is kind of ironic since this province continually puts out strong talent for the Nats and Clubs.
But if the Aviators turn out to be legit and not just a smoke screen for the TOA, then I’m all for it.
Go Aviators!!!
Hey that would mean, providing Ottawa gets a team, that the Nutrilite Tourney would have five teams and that would rock and roll.
November 6th, 2009 at 12:49 pm
Um, the Aviators are the old team, Cris. The one that crashed.
November 6th, 2009 at 12:54 pm
Further to that, Ben? Wouldn’t you agree that although your article back then was based on the realities of the time, that times have certainly changed?
That the USL is way more viable than the A-League and seeing that interest for footie in this country has exponentially grown in the last 5 years due to TFC, Montreal CCL run, and the Whitecaps expansion to MLS.
Would you let yourself believe in a new franchise along side Ottawa? Or is it still to early?
What I really like about all this is we’re actually talking about new football franchises in Canada…
LOVE IT!!!
November 6th, 2009 at 12:57 pm
Yeah I know they crashed buddy… I should have just called them the “Edmonton Proposed Soccer Franchise” then… sorry
November 6th, 2009 at 2:39 pm
Hey Ben;
Speaking as the spectator who once bought an Aviators ticket (not sure anyone else can claim that dubious distinction…), “yes”.
The whole thing was a fiasco. The owners (who may have been well intentioned, it was impossible to know with certainty) clearly dropped the ball by banking on 11,000 spectators in a league where the average was around 2,500, and even the best marketed teams in large media centres struggled to draw more than about 4,500 fans.
This was a case study in business failure… poor research, undercapitalised owners, limited fan interest, poor venue for the sport, crowded marketplace w entrenched competition… the list goes on.
But the league also failed in it’s responsibility to clue these guys in… they (USL) cashed the expansion fee and that was about it. Of course, they spent far more than that to stage the final few games I’m sure. It was a sad display, honestly. And the team imploded on the pitch as much as off it, with staggering personnel changes, fights and unpaid bills. They finally moved to Foote Field and drew a little better, but the bad press had caught up the the team (unlike the unpaid bills, many of which are still outstanding) and the league pulled the plug, unable to find new owners (understandably). In my view, everyone involved deserves a share of the blame for this fiasco. It should never have gotten off the ground.
We all remember the days of the Drillers and Brickmen. What we forget is that the period when these teams had good (even average) support was very, very short. We like to think of Edmonton as a great soccer city. 50k turned out for Brazil. Similar numbers for the Women’s nats a few years ago. But take a closer look… Kowalchuk staged an exhibition game last summer with “second tier” clubs (though better than anything we are likely to get on a permanent basis - Everton v River Plate, if I recall correctly), and lost his shirt. I’m told only 15k were there.
I hate to say it, because I’d love to see a USL-1 (or even 2) level team here, but I don’t see it working. There is no suitable facility for the club and there just aren’t enough paying fans ready to commit. Put another way, these new owners better be prepared to lose $1M annually for 5-10 years… and if you have that kind of cake, why spend it on a USL team, honestly?
It’s no accident that the only “A list” owners USL has in Canada are billionaires, not millionaires. Breaking even is probably not possible on a regular basis.
November 6th, 2009 at 5:05 pm
While I think Ottawa, Edmonton, and Calgary (and possibly Winnipeg) could all make it with USL1 teams, I’m worried about two main factors. First, none of those cities has a really great USL1 venue. The existing facilities are either way to big (CFL parks) or a set of bleachers at a high school somewhere with no amenities. The second potential problem is the lack of Canadian opponents, assuming Montreal jumps to MLS. Winnipeg playing against Vancouver or Montreal would ensure at least a couple of good draws each season. Being the only Canadian team in a league with a bunch of largely second tier US cities is going to make for a tougher draw.
November 6th, 2009 at 9:06 pm
Well, with the 2015 Pan-Am Games just recently awarded to Toronto, perhaps Hamilton will get a shot at USL-1, seeing as this means the city will get a new stadium to replace Ivor Wynne Stadium and that Ti-Cats owner Bob Young has stated an interest for just such a team in that new stadium.
November 6th, 2009 at 11:18 pm
Hey speaking about the Pan-Am Games, at least we get to see Canada soccer team playing in their own backyard against some South American National Teams! Pretty excited for that
November 6th, 2009 at 11:26 pm
I used to go watch the Brickman,but the level of play was atrocious…
There is also this 8 indoor soccer teams that are trying to start a League of some sort,however,can’t get off the ground…Believe it or not,they play in hockey rings and kick the ball off of the boards etc…They never started ,but talk about it for 3 years now…Calgary,Winnipeg,Edmonton and Saksatoon and some other ones…
The one model that might work would be having to put a levy on all recreational soccer participants,maybe 20 dollars a year,to fund a local semi-pro or a pro team,in places that lack enough rich people to underwrite that…
That way the recreational masses would contribute something meaningful into development of the game…They could save the 20$ a year by having one slurpy less every month.{instead of 30 of them ,just 29}
November 7th, 2009 at 3:32 pm
MM:
I wouldn’t favour a levy on rec players to fund semi pro teams… these things need to stand by themselves. If there isn’t enough support to keep them afloat, then they need to disappear.
I thought the indoor league had already played an ‘exhibition’ season last year (hockey season…)? I agree that it is unlikely to take root, even if it does get rolling at some point.
Saber: Hamilton and Ottawa are interesting possibilities. Both need facilities to play in, but there is a good chance both will get them (seems Hamilton is certain now, while Ottawa is still a little up in the air w Lansdowne “live”).
The BC interior/Vancouver Island also has several USL teams (most at USL-2 or PDL level) currently playing. I guess there’s hope, but I’m not sure anything like a national league could be cobbled together from all this. I hate to sound like a wet blanket, but I just don’t see it at this point.
November 8th, 2009 at 12:55 am
The semi pre teams and clubs should examine how hockey can manage the travel expenses etc…and try to emulate that.
November 9th, 2009 at 12:21 pm
MM,
Hockey (specifically the CHL) does it by not paying the players, keeping travel to bus-league levels, and drawing an average of about 4000 fans per game.
I don’t see Canadians coming out at USL1 levels (4000 per game) to watch PDL level (unpaid) soccer in a sufficient number of cities to allow bus travel. The Canadian soccer league that best mirrors the hockey setup is the CSL but its level of play is such that it can only draw an average of about 500 fans per game (and even there a few high drawing teams really pull the average up).
November 9th, 2009 at 10:55 pm
Why do you worry about drawing fans to Junior or Developmental Soccer Leagues?